RSS Feed for This PostCurrent Article

Freebsd vs Ubuntu Server fresh install security?

Freebsd 8.3 vs Ubuntu Server 10.4.1 fresh install security.

Which os would be more secure as a web server?

Running apache, php5, mysql

What searched for:

  • FreeBSD more secure than linux
  • freebsd or ubuntu server
  • freebsd vs linux security
  • freebsd vs ubuntu
  • which is more secure ubuntu or freebsd?
  • email Freebsd vs Ubuntu Server fresh install security?
  • facebook Freebsd vs Ubuntu Server fresh install security?
  • twitter Freebsd vs Ubuntu Server fresh install security?
  • myspace Freebsd vs Ubuntu Server fresh install security?
  • linkedin Freebsd vs Ubuntu Server fresh install security?
  • digg Freebsd vs Ubuntu Server fresh install security?
  • bebo Freebsd vs Ubuntu Server fresh install security?
  • google buzz Freebsd vs Ubuntu Server fresh install security?
  • microsoft Freebsd vs Ubuntu Server fresh install security?
  • delicious Freebsd vs Ubuntu Server fresh install security?
  • yahoo Freebsd vs Ubuntu Server fresh install security?
  • yahoo buzz Freebsd vs Ubuntu Server fresh install security?
  • google Freebsd vs Ubuntu Server fresh install security?

Trackback URL

RSS Feed for This Post3 Comment(s)

  1. Toby | Nov 12, 2010 | Reply

    BSD’s are definitely known for being more secure than Linux. Now, if you want ultimate security, then check out OpenBSD (vice FreeBSD). In over 10 years, they’ve only had two remote exploit flaws. I double-dog dare you to find another operating system with that kind of security track record:

    Additionally, the OpenBSD team is responsible for several security technologies used by other BSD’s, Linux, and even Mac OSX such as OpenSSH and Open SSL. Also consider that the Twofish encryption algorithm (invented by the OpenBSD team) was almost chosen as the AES standard. The reason the US DoD went with Rijndael instead was simply a matter of the open source license that had been applied to Twofish not being compatible with what the DoD wanted the rights to do with AES.

    http://www.openbsd.org/

  2. Nev Er | Nov 12, 2010 | Reply

    That would be Ubuntu. The o/s sections are encrypted and will result in fewer crashes

  3. Jamie | Nov 12, 2010 | Reply

    FreeBSD… by a long shot.

    For a lot of reasons, security being one of them.

    Ubuntu is a great desktop, but it’s not a server OS.

    Linux is pretty good, (better than windows..) but for web servers, FreeBSD does a better job, there’s a reason Apache is developed on freebsd :-) (that said, linux is better at other things, such as exploring newer technologies)

    If your web applications were java based, I might be inclined to say linux, but freebsd does a great job of running php5.

    FreeBSD seems to handle server load better than Linux.

    FreeBSD also has a mature implementation of “jails” while linux has had a checkered history in this area.. I once relied on “vserver” only to have it abandoned, I’d be a little gun-shy about trusting linux containers until they’ve been in use a couple years.

    Jails can vastly improve security by the way they isolate parts of the system. Running apache in a jail will prevent it from having access to the outer machine.

    You probably don’t want an encrypted filesystem for performance reasons.

    OpenBSD is very secure, I use it as a firewall, but it lacks jail support.

RSS Feed for This PostPost a Comment

*